United States v. Jackson
This text of United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellate Case: 23-6162 Document: 010111011607 Date Filed: 03/07/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 7, 2024 _________________________________ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 23-6162 (D.C. No. 5:21-CR-00077-SLP-7) RICHARD JACKSON, a/k/a G, (W.D. Okla.)
Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________
Before CARSON, EBEL, and FEDERICO, Circuit Judges. _________________________________
Richard Jackson pleaded guilty to money-laundering conspiracy, see 18 U.S.C.
§ 1956(h), and being a felon in possession of a firearm, see id. § 922(g), and received
a 264-month prison sentence. He has appealed from that sentence, although his plea
agreement contains an appeal waiver. The government now moves to enforce that
waiver under United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc).
Through counsel, Jackson states “he does not object to dismissal of this direct appeal
pursuant to [Hahn].” Resp. at 1. In light of Jackson’s non-opposition, we grant the
government’s motion to enforce and dismiss this appeal.
Entered for the Court Per Curiam
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-ca10-2024.