United States v. Industrious

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2008·No. 07-7644·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7644

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JERRY INDUSTRIOUS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:00-cr-00020-NCT; 1:06-cv-00094-NCT)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Industrious, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jerry Industrious appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on Industrious’ motion for reduction of sentence filed

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Industrious, Nos. 1:00-cr-00020-NCT; 1:06-cv-00094-NCT (M.D.N.C.

Oct. 24, 2007). We further deny Industrious’ motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Industrious, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Industrious (United States v. Industrious) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related