United States v. Industrious
This text of United States v. Industrious (United States v. Industrious) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7644
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JERRY INDUSTRIOUS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:00-cr-00020-NCT; 1:06-cv-00094-NCT)
Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Industrious, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jerry Industrious appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on Industrious’ motion for reduction of sentence filed
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Industrious, Nos. 1:00-cr-00020-NCT; 1:06-cv-00094-NCT (M.D.N.C.
Oct. 24, 2007). We further deny Industrious’ motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Industrious, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-industrious-ca4-2008.