United States v. Hughes

318 F. App'x 162
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2009·No. No. 08-8098·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Bronson Hughes appeals the district court’s order granting relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and its order denying relief on Hughes’ subsequently filed § 3582(c)(2) motion. We find no reversible error and we thus affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 6:02-cr-70105-nkm-2 (W.D.Va. Sept. 2 & 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hughes, 318 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2009).

318 F. App'x 162 (United States v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related