United States v. Hughes

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 2009
Docket08-7611
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Hughes (United States v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hughes, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7611

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN ERIC HUGHES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell Wallace, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant

Hughes’ motion to file a supplemental informal brief, we deny

Hughes’ motions to stay the appeal and to modify or correct the

record and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v. Hughes, No. 3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Aug.

1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Hughes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hughes-ca4-2009.