United States v. Hughes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH BRONSON HUGHES, a/k/a Andrew Alfonso Skeeter,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:02-cr-70105-nkm-2)

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Bronson Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Bronson Hughes appeals the district court’s

order granting relief on his motion for reduction of sentence

filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and its order

denying relief on Hughes' subsequently filed § 3582(c)(2)

motion. We find no reversible error and we thus affirm both

orders for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Hughes, No. 6:02-cr-70105-nkm-2 (W.D. Va. Sept. 2 &

19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED