United States v. Hinkson

611 F.3d 1098, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14392, 2010 WL 2757419
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2010·No. 05-30303·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing by the Limited En Banc Court and for Rehearing by the Full Court is denied. Chief Judge Kozinski and Judges Pregerson, Wardlaw, W. Fletcher, and Paez voted to grant the petition. The remaining judges voted to deny it.

The original en banc opinion filed on November 5, 2009 remains unchanged, except that Chief Judge Kozinski concurs only in the portion of the opinion that clarifies this court’s abuse of discretion standard of review, but dissents from the application of that standard to the facts of this case as stated in his partial dissent filed today with this order. The original en banc dissent filed by Judge W. Fletcher on November 5, 2009 is vacated and replaced by the attached dissent filed today with this order.

No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hinkson, 611 F.3d 1098, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14392, 2010 WL 2757419 (9th Cir. 2010).

611 F.3d 1098 (United States v. Hinkson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Elven Swisher
811 F.3d 299 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Linda Mastro v. James Rigby, Jr.
764 F.3d 1090 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Pitts v. Terrible Herbst, Inc.
653 F.3d 1081 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Swisher
790 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Idaho, 2011)
United States v. Alvarez
617 F.3d 1198 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Hinkson
611 F.3d 1098 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)