United States v. Hinkson
This text of 611 F.3d 1098 (United States v. Hinkson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing by the Limited En Banc Court and for Rehearing by the Full Court is denied. Chief Judge Kozinski and Judges Pregerson, Wardlaw, W. Fletcher, and Paez voted to grant the petition. The remaining judges voted to deny it.
The original en banc opinion filed on November 5, 2009 remains unchanged, except that Chief Judge Kozinski concurs only in the portion of the opinion that clarifies this court’s abuse of discretion standard of review, but dissents from the application of that standard to the facts of this case as stated in his partial dissent filed today with this order. The original en banc dissent filed by Judge W. Fletcher on November 5, 2009 is vacated and replaced by the attached dissent filed today with this order.
No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
611 F.3d 1098, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14392, 2010 WL 2757419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hinkson-ca9-2010.