United States v. Hinkson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hinkson. Read the opinion of the Court — 585 F.3d 1247
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2008·No. 05-30303·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-30303 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-04-00127-RCT DAVID ROLAND HINKSON, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.  Filed October 20, 2008

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Silverman and Tallman did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

14875 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hinkson, (9th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Hinkson (United States v. Hinkson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.