United States v. Hickman

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Hickman

165 F.3d 1020, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 721, 1999 WL 22968

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 1999

DocketNo. 97-40237

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 165 F.3d 1020 (United States v. Hickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Hickman, 165 F.3d 1020, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 721, 1999 WL 22968 (5th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC AS TO APPELLANTS MARKUS D. CHOPANE AND EDWIN T. LIMBRICK

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc filed by Markus D. Cho-pane and Edwin T. Limbrick, and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in [1021]*1021favor of granting the rehearings en banc; and, a majority of judges in active service having determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear the appeals of Masontae Hickman, Jyi R. McCray and Edmond Gasaway en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these causes shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that under 5th Cir. R. 42.1, the mandate issued in the appeals of Masontae Hickman, Jyi R. McCray and Edmond Gasaway are recalled to prevent injustice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI