United States v. Henderson

305 F. App'x 135
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 31, 2008·No. 08-7057·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7057

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ERIK D. HENDERSON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00343-LMB-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 31, 2008

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Erik D. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark D. Lytle, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Erik D. Henderson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Henderson, No. 1:04-cr-

00343-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Henderson, 305 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2008).

305 F. App'x 135 (United States v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related