United States v. Henderson
This text of United States v. Henderson (United States v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7530
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TOMMY HENDERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:02-cr-00826-PMD)
Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 7, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tommy Henderson appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Motion to Reopen Case and Dismiss Indictment.” We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Henderson, No. 2:02-cr-00826-PMD (D.S.C.
Sept. 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Henderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-henderson-ca4-2008.