United States v. Haynes

139 F. App'x 590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Haynes. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 F. App'x 163
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2005·No. No. 05-6701·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Louis Haynes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying Haynes’ motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Haynes’ motion for reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Haynes, 139 F. App'x 590 (4th Cir. 2005).

139 F. App'x 590 (United States v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Michael D. Williams
674 F.2d 310 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)