United States v. Haynes

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Haynes. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 F. App'x 163
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2005·No. 05-6701·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6701

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

VINCENT LOUIS HAYNES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-231; CA-00-141-AM)

Submitted: July 14, 2005 Decided: July 27, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Louis Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Sonya LeGene Sacks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Vincent Louis Haynes appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying Haynes’

motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have

reviewed the record and find no abuse of the district court’s

discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. United

States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Haynes’

motion for reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Haynes, (4th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Haynes (United States v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Michael D. Williams
674 F.2d 310 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)