United States v. Harmon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6962

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL TRACY HARMON, a/k/a Mike, a/k/a Mikey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:99-cr-00023-RBS-13)

Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Tracy Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Tracy Harmon appeals the district court’s orders

denying Harmon’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2000), and Harmon’s motions for reconsideration of that order. We

have reviewed the record and affirm the denial of the underlying

order for the reasons stated by the district court. In addition,

we find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in denying the

motions for reconsideration. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d

310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s orders. United States v. Harmon, No. 2:99-cr-00023-RBS-13

(E.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2006; April 19, 2006; May 2, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -