United States v. Harmon

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2007·No. 07-6791·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6791

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ANTHONY HARMON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00153-CMC-1)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 17, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Harmon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Harmon, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion “nunc pro tunc for review of sentence.”

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Harmon, No. 1:00-cr-00153-CMC-1 (D.S.C.

May 17, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harmon, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Harmon (United States v. Harmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.