United States v. Hardy
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Howard Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac[851]*851cordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Hardy, No. 1:95-cr-00156-LMB-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 22, 2009; entered Apr. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
332 F. App'x 850 (United States v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.