United States v. Hardy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6846

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

HOWARD HARDY,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:95-cr-00156-LMB-2)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Howard Hardy appeals the district court's order

denying his self-styled 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for

sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Hardy, No. 1:95-cr-00156-LMB-2 (E.D.

Va. filed Apr. 22, 2009; entered Apr. 23, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED