United States v. Harding

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Harding. Read the opinion of the Court — 228 F. App'x 272
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2009·No. 09-6670·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6670

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BILLY CAMPBELL HARDING,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:02-cr-00381-WDQ-3; 1:09-cv-00733-WDQ)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Campbell Harding, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Billy Campbell Harding appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the

district court. See United States v. Harding, No. 1:02-cr-

00381-WDQ-3 (D. Md. filed Mar. 31, 2009; entered Apr. 1, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harding, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Harding (United States v. Harding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related