United States v. Harding
This text of 329 F. App'x 504 (United States v. Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Billy Campbell Harding appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Harding, No. 1:02-cr00381-WDQ-S (D. Md. filed Mar. 31, 2009; entered Apr. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-harding-ca4-2009.