United States v. Hamilton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hamilton. Read the opinion of the Court — 360 F. App'x 424
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2008·No. 08-7078·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7078

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILL HAMILTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:96-CR-00679-MBS-2)

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 20, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Will Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Will Hamilton appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Hamilton, No. 3:96-cr-00679-MBS-2 (D.S.C. June 19,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hamilton, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Hamilton (United States v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related