United States v. Hamilton
This text of United States v. Hamilton (United States v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7078
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILL HAMILTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:96-CR-00679-MBS-2)
Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 20, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Will Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Will Hamilton appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Hamilton, No. 3:96-cr-00679-MBS-2 (D.S.C. June 19,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hamilton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hamilton-ca4-2008.