United States v. Gregory

298 F. App'x 271
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2008·No. No. 08-6525·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Monica Gregory appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gregory, No. 4:02-cr-35-CWH (D.S.C. filed Mar. 18, entered Mar. 19, 2008). We deny Gregory’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gregory, 298 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2008).

298 F. App'x 271 (United States v. Gregory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related