United States v. Gregory
Opinion
Courtney Floyd Gregory appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gregory, No. 4:96-cr-00022-RAJ-l (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 14, entered Mar. 17, 2008; May 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
295 F. App'x 589 (United States v. Gregory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.