United States v. Green

86 F. App'x 634
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 F. App'x 936
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 9, 2004·No. 03-7611·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clinton Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Green, Nos. CR-95-97; CA-03-395-2 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 18, 2003). We grant Green’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny as unnecessary his motion for a certificate of appealability, and deny his motion to remand and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, 86 F. App'x 634 (4th Cir. 2004).

86 F. App'x 634 (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related