United States v. Green

82 F. App'x 842
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 F. App'x 936
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2003·No. 03-4237·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Glenn Green was convicted after a jury trial of two counts each of armed bank robbery and using a firearm during a crime of violence. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial based on the Government’s non-disclosure of Brady * material. We have examined the briefs and record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court from the bench. (J.A. at 931-32). We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Green, 82 F. App'x 842 (4th Cir. 2003).

82 F. App'x 842 (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)