United States v. Green
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6399
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARLON GREEN, a/k/a Carroll Benns,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-91-221-HNM, CA-97-1379-HNM)
Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlon Green, Appellant Pro Se. William Warren Hamel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
After the district court granted a certificate of appealabil-
ity, Marlon Green appealed the district court’s order denying his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Green, Nos. CR-91-221-HNM;
CA-97-1379-HNM (D. Md. Aug. 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Green (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.