United States v. Green

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES NEAL GREEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-95-72, CA-96-1787-3-19)

Submitted: December 23, 1997 Decided: April 20, 1998

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Neal Green, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Green, Nos. CR-95-72; CA-96-1787-3-19 (D.S.C. May 27, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for transcripts at government

expense and his request for leave to file a supplemental informal

brief based on such transcripts. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

DISMISSED