United States v. Green
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6113
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DERRICK GREEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-93-180, CA-96-2573)
Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Green, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking relief from the district court's
prior order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e) motion for return of
seized property. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Green, Nos. CR-93-180; CA-96-2573 (D. Md. Jan. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Green (United States v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.