United States v. Graves

63 F. App'x 769
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Graves. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 F. App'x 517
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2003·No. No. 03-6235·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Daniel Graves seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and denying his motion to reconsider pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Graves has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Graves, 63 F. App'x 769 (4th Cir. 2003).

63 F. App'x 769 (United States v. Graves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)