United States v. Graves

63 F. App'x 769
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 2003
DocketNo. 03-6235
StatusPublished

This text of 63 F. App'x 769 (United States v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Graves, 63 F. App'x 769 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Daniel Graves seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and denying his motion to reconsider pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Graves has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 F. App'x 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-graves-ca4-2003.