United States v. Graham

321 F. App'x 322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Graham. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 F. App'x 281
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2009·No. No. 08-8200·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Marcel Graham appeals the district court’s order partially granting Graham’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graham, No. 3:99-cr-00137-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2008). We deny Graham’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Graham, 321 F. App'x 322 (4th Cir. 2009).

321 F. App'x 322 (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related