United States v. Graham

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 16, 2009
Docket08-7572
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Graham (United States v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Graham, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7572

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY GRAHAM,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00091-RAJ-JEB-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 16, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Graham appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2)(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Graham, No.

4:07-cr-00091-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Graham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-graham-ca4-2009.