United States v. Graham

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Graham. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 F. App'x 281
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 16, 2009·No. 08-7572·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7572

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY GRAHAM,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00091-RAJ-JEB-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 16, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Graham appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2)(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Graham, No.

4:07-cr-00091-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Graham, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Graham (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related