United States v. Graham

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Graham. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 F. App'x 281
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2009·No. 08-8200·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8200

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMIE MARCEL GRAHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00137-FDW-1)

Submitted: March 16, 2009 Decided: March 31, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert C. Carpenter, JOHN C. HUNTER LAW FIRM, LLC, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Timika Shafeek, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamie Marcel Graham appeals the district court’s order

partially granting Graham’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)

motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graham,

No. 3:99-cr-00137-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2008). We deny

Graham’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Graham, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Graham (United States v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related