United States v. Gomez
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6356
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HUGO RENE GOMEZ, a/k/a Michael Christopher Fiero, a/k/a Michael Christopher Fierro,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:04-cr-00423-WLO)
Submitted: May 10, 2007 Decided: May 15, 2007
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hugo Rene Gomez, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Hugo Rene Gomez seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
order denying his motion for a transcript at government expense
made in his underlying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Gomez seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Gomez (United States v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.