United States v. Gomez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gomez. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 F. App'x 353
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2004·No. 04-6119·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6119

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SEBASTIAN GOMEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CR-96-806)

Submitted: June 9, 2004 Decided: July 14, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sebastian Gomez, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Sebastian Gomez appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for clarification and for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Gomez, No. CR-96-806 (D.S.C. filed

Dec. 17, 2003 & entered Dec. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gomez, (4th Cir. 2004).

United States v. Gomez (United States v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.