United States v. Gomez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gomez

33 F. App'x 137

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gomez. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 F. App'x 353 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2002·No. 02-6281·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sebastian Gomez seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government and denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gomez, Nos. CR-96-806; CA-01-2486-2-18 (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sebastian Gomez seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government and denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gomez, Nos. CR-96-806; CA-01-2486-2-18 (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Gomez, 33 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

33 F. App'x 137 (United States v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related