United States v. Gomez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gomez

102 F. App'x 353

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2004·No. No. 04-6119·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sebastian Gomez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for clarification and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gomez, No. CR-96-806 (D.S.C. filed Dec. 17, 2003 & entered Dec. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sebastian Gomez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for clarification and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gomez, No. CR-96-806 (D.S.C. filed Dec. 17, 2003 & entered Dec. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Gomez, 102 F. App'x 353 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

102 F. App'x 353 (United States v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related