United States v. Gantt

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2010·No. 10-6543·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GEORGE BILLY LEE GANTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:04-cr-01013-HFF-1)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 3, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Billy Lee Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Billy Lee Gantt appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Gantt, No.

8:04-cr-01013-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gantt, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Gantt (United States v. Gantt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related