United States v. Gantt

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2009
Docket08-8002
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gantt (United States v. Gantt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gantt, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GEORGE BILLY LEE GANTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:04-cr-01013-HFF-1)

Submitted: February 27, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Billy Lee Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Billy Lee Gantt appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Gantt, No. 8:04-cr-01013-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 5, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gantt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gantt-ca4-2009.