United States v. Gantt
This text of United States v. Gantt (United States v. Gantt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GEORGE BILLY LEE GANTT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:04-cr-01013-HFF-1)
Submitted: February 27, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Billy Lee Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
George Billy Lee Gantt appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Gantt, No. 8:04-cr-01013-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 5, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gantt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gantt-ca4-2009.