United States v. Gaddy

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 7, 2006·No. 06-7097·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7097

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ELIJAH JAMES GADDY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00109-2)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elijah James Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Kimlani Murray Ford, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Elijah James Gaddy appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp. 2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gaddy,

No. 3:03-cr-00109-2 (W.D.N.C. May 25, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gaddy, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Gaddy (United States v. Gaddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related