United States v. Gaddy

204 F. App'x 245
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 7, 2006·No. No. 06-7097·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Elijah James Gaddy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp.2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gaddy, No. 3:03-cr-00109-2 (W.D.N.C. May 25, 2006). We dispense [246]*246with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gaddy, 204 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2006).

204 F. App'x 245 (United States v. Gaddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related