United States v. Franklin

311 F. App'x 702
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 2009
Docket08-30406
StatusUnpublished

This text of 311 F. App'x 702 (United States v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Franklin, 311 F. App'x 702 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Edwin L. Franklin appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of making fraudulent claims for Hurricane Katrina-related disaster relief to the Fed *703 eral Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and with making false representations to FEMA in connection with the fraudulent claims. Franklin argues that the district court erred by denying him a two-level downward adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 based on acceptance of responsibility.

The district court denied the downward adjustment due to Franklin’s repeated use of drugs while awaiting sentencing. The district court’s determination that Franklin’s drug use was inconsistent with the acceptance of responsibility is not without foundation. See United States v. Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2452, 171 L.Ed.2d 248 (2008); United States v. Watkins, 911 F.2d 983, 984-85 (5th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kenneth Ray Watkins
911 F.2d 983 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Juarez-Duarte
513 F.3d 204 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Mathis v. United States
128 S. Ct. 2453 (Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 F. App'x 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-franklin-ca5-2009.