United States v. Francis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6623
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PATRICK EARL FRANCIS, a/k/a Jerome Brown,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:94-cr-40106-JLK)
Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 3, 2008
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Earl Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Patrick Earl Francis appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying
his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Francis, No. 7:94-cr-40106-
JKL (W.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Francis (United States v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.