United States v. Francis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Francis. Read the opinion of the Court — 329 F. App'x 421
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2008·No. 08-6623·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6623

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PATRICK EARL FRANCIS, a/k/a Jerome Brown,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:94-cr-40106-JLK)

Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 3, 2008

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Earl Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Patrick Earl Francis appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying

his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Francis, No. 7:94-cr-40106-

JKL (W.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Francis, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Francis (United States v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related