United States v. Francis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8259

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND JEROME FRANCIS, a/k/a Raymond Rudone Ramsey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:96-cr-00021-LHT-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 3, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Jerome Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Raymond Jerome Francis appeals the district court’s

order denying his “Motion of Complaint . . . And Request For

Appropriate Relief.” We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Francis, No. 1:96-cr-

00021-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED