United States v. Forde
This text of United States v. Forde (United States v. Forde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7293
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BEVERLY FORDE, a/k/a Cynthia Taylor, a/k/a Margaret Hescott,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:92-cr-00429-CMH-1)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 1, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beverly Forde, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Nicole Gibson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Beverly Forde appeals from the district court’s order
denying her motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Forde, No. 1:92-
cr-00429-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 14, 2008; entered July 15,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Forde, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-forde-ca4-2008.