United States v. Forde

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2007·No. 06-7758·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7758

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BEVERLY FORDE, a/k/a Cynthia Taylor, a/k/a Margaret Hescott,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:92-cr-00429-CMH)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beverly Forde, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Beverly Forde appeals from the district court’s order

denying her motion for modification of her sentence in light of

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Forde,

No. 1:92-cr-00429-CMH (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Forde, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Forde (United States v. Forde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)