United States v. Forde
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7758
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BEVERLY FORDE, a/k/a Cynthia Taylor, a/k/a Margaret Hescott,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:92-cr-00429-CMH)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beverly Forde, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Beverly Forde appeals from the district court’s order
denying her motion for modification of her sentence in light of
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Forde,
No. 1:92-cr-00429-CMH (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Forde (United States v. Forde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.