United States v. Flores

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 F.3d 385
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 28, 1997·No. 97-50057·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50057 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESSE ROLAND FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-92-CR-69-1 - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesse Roland Flores, federal inmate ##25755-138, appeals the

denial of his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We

detect no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of the

motion. Although the guideline amendments upon which Flores

premised his motion are given retroactive effect, these

amendments do not apply to Flores’ sentence. See Flores v.

United States, No. SA-92-CR-69 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 1996).

This appeal is without arguable merit and thus is frivolous.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-50057 -2-

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The appeal is DISMISSED. We caution

Flores that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will

invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Flores

is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that

they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Flores, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Flores (United States v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related