United States v. Flores
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-40057 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EVELINA FLORES,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C:94-CR-144 - - - - - - - - - -
November 9, 1995
Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Evalina Flores appeals her guilty plea conviction and
sentence for money laundering with the intent to promote the
delivery and sale of a controlled substance. Flores argues that
the district court erred by increasing her offense level by three
levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1(b)(1). We have reviewed the
record and have determined that the district court did not commit
plain error by increasing Flores's offense level. See United
States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en
banc).
AFFIRMED.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Flores (United States v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.