United States v. Fleming

443 F. App'x 825
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6370
StatusPublished

This text of 443 F. App'x 825 (United States v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fleming, 443 F. App'x 825 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fleming, No. 2:06-cr-00655-DCN-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2010). We deny Fleming’s motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 F. App'x 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fleming-ca4-2011.